Better as movies than books
Feb. 1st, 2007 01:19 pmHeard a comment made on the radio that books were always better than the movies and wanted to immediately take issue with this. So wrong.
I can think of 3 movies right offhand that dispute this =
'Jaws' was tons better than the book - and made one of the characters sympathetic instead of a complete ass;
'Princess Bride' is better as a movie than a book by far [in part because the author just plays too many literary pransk with himself];
and 'The Relic' is much better than the book [which isn't saying much, this is true]
I can think of 3 movies right offhand that dispute this =
'Jaws' was tons better than the book - and made one of the characters sympathetic instead of a complete ass;
'Princess Bride' is better as a movie than a book by far [in part because the author just plays too many literary pransk with himself];
and 'The Relic' is much better than the book [which isn't saying much, this is true]
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 02:14 am (UTC)I find that when the opposite happens (movies being made into books), the movies are usually better. Come to think of it, this holds true for games as well. The "Baldur's Gate" books are hideously inane, as was the book "Terminator 2" back when I tried to read it in college. There was some slight merit to the "Wishbringer" and "Planetfall" novels, but then again I'm slightly biased in favor of Craig Shaw Gardner's writing.
And the couple of "Magic The Gathering" novels I tried read...my only impression was that they tried to cram too much into one story and only left me feeling confused.